MusicFIRST Asks FCC To Investigate Radio Stations

[Allen Johnston]

The musicFIRST Coalition (Fairness in Radio Starting Today) filed a formal request that the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) investigate and take action against radio stations for abusing their license to use the airwaves, a valuable public resource.

The filing details how radio stations across the country refuse to air musicFIRST ads, threaten artists who support the effort to create a fair performance right on radio and continue to run misleading ads produced by the National Association of Broadcasters - all in an effort to further their own private commercial interest at the expense of their public interest obligations.

"For more than 80 years radio stations have been using the work of artists and musicians without compensating them, now they're using the public airwaves unfairly for their own self interest," said musicFIRST Executive Director, Jennifer Bendall. "We respect the First Amendment rights of broadcasters to air their views in this and any debate, but they've crossed the line. They have engaged in a concerted effort to promote their own financial interests above their legal duty to serve the public interest by providing truthful and accurate information."

Radio stations must ensure that their private interests, including their private financial interests, do not interfere with their obligation to serve the public. The musicFIRST filing notes that the use of a broadcast license to further a licensee's personal economic interest is particularly egregious where it results in the skewing and distorting of a public debate.

"Time and time again we have been told ‘NO!' by radio stations when it comes to airing our side of the debate," said Bendall. "Many stations are rejecting our ads without even reading the script. It's an absolute sham. Ironically, they are refusing to take our money at the same time that they cry poverty to avoid fairly compensating artists for the music upon which they have built their businesses."

The ads and on-air commentary unfairly prey on the public's fears by calling it a tax, which it's not, saying all the money is going to foreign companies, which it's not, and intimating that this is a racial issue by claiming that there is no black representation in the process and that it will "murder black radio" - again not true.

"Even more offensive is the effort to silence artists through threats and retribution," Bendall said. "No one should ever be penalized for working for what they think is right; for participating in the democratic process; for exercising their First Amendment right to correct a decades-old wrong. But that is just what these radio stations have done."

According to the musicFIRST filing, one major radio group dropped a top selling artist's record after he spoke in support of performance rights legislation. The program director of a Florida radio station declined to add an artist's recordings to his station's playlist because the artist is listed as a member of the musicFIRST Coalition. Another director of programming told a representative of two prominent artists that the artist's support for the Performance Rights Act would have a "chilling effect" on their relationship. And a Delaware radio station boycotted all artists affiliated with musicFIRST for an entire month.

"These are the cases we know about," Bendall said. "We can only imagine what may be happening under the cover of silence."

musicFIRST is asking the FCC to investigate these actions, find that the stations have violated their public interest obligations and consider the broadcasters' malfeasance in connection with their license renewal. musicFIRST is also asking the FCC to consider this conduct as part of its overall review of the length of radio stations licenses, currently seven years.

"Our message to the FCC is clear," Bendall said. "We respect a broadcaster's right to oppose the Performance Rights Act. But we cannot tolerate broadcasters' use of the public airwaves to stifle debate, threaten artists and musicians and undermine the public interest in pursuit of their narrow, private business interests."

[Damien Willis]

This is utterly absurd. Radio has absolutely NO responsibility or obligation to run the advertising of musicFIRST. (This issue has already been raised when terrestrial radio refused the advertising of Sirius and XM.) If stations oppose the "Performance Tax," and a government-imposed and enforced fee IS a tax, they have the right to encourage their listeners who appreciate free and local radio to oppose it also. This has NOTHING to do with a station's obligation to "serve the public."

Furthermore, stations refuse to play artists with whom they disagree (ideologically) ALL the time. How many stations pulled Chris Brown from rotation after his run-in with the law? How many pulled KRS-One's music after his remarks about 9/11? How many stations boycotted Public Enemy after Professor Griff's claim that the "Jews are responsible for the majority of the wickedness in the world?" This is the nature of BOYCOTTS. And, like it or not, licensees are business-men and -women. If you are unhappy with the radio industry, with advertising-supported stations and their ad-supported programming, perhaps musicFIRST would like to help you take that fight to the FCC.

[Popz]

Thatz Freedom

lilBoy Ent. 09

[Cres O'Neal]

Is this another frivolous lawsuit or what? Yet another group with too much time on its hands.